Printable View
how stupid the boundaries set up by religions *Cough cough* are
Yes, they are... Although sexual orientation is not really set by religion but nature, from our ancestors to our very cells, from insects to humans. You don't want to stick it up another man's ass because it's in your nature not to want to, just like it's in your nature to not want to suffer pain, or to breathe air.
You keep telling yourself that.
You won't engay me, mostly because even if upper brain considered it, lower brain only gets hard for girls, and lower brain overrides upper brain.
Moreover, you haven't explained how come straightness and gayness are a matter of religion, and I doubt you can, because no matter what religion says, sex is older, and it's through working sex how life (not only humanity) came to be what it is now. Calling normal people weird because of religion is like saying violence was invented in anime. Besides, you seem to forget most atheists are straight, and most straight people are not straight because a priest told them where cock goes, but because of where cock wants to go.
Replace "every" with "my" and you'll have a correct statement.
Ancient Greeks had sex with guys. It felt ogod, and they flet that only men were equal to one another. It wasn't until a few certain religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Note that these all are from the common father, Abraham), that being gay was an evil.
And animals are gay for pleasure. Look at monkeys, the closest to man.
No matter what you say, we seek pleasure, breeding is not always what we want. And when it comes to pleasure, your cock doesn't differentiate, your higher conciousness does. And your higher conciousness is subject to influences such as society, religion, and what you find aesthetically appealing. It's no different than how I like brunette white women with blue or brown eyes the best, while you like Asian women best.
Oh, and I'm not trying to engay you. If you haven't noticed, nearly everytime that this comes up, it's you throwing your closeminded mindset at me, as a jest, yet mocking my midset still.
<font color="#345E81" size="1">[ April 27, 2005 03:14 PM: Message edited by: Xellos ]</font>
PWND!!!!
Are you sure you're not gay? lol J/K. Thx for the info btw
*Sigh* Do you think a girl's a lesbian when she says how she finds another girl pretty? There's no difference. I'm just not stickingw itht he general male macho homophobia-ness, and can appreciate pretty guys for being pretty. No actual attraction or anything, just a simple appreciation of it, the same as if you find a beautiful sculpture to be beautiful, without wnating to hump a hole in it. Not everything aesthetically appealing is converted into sexual terms, and just because it's applied to humans, it doesn't mean that either.
IRT Xellos(1): Ancient Greeks had sex with guys.
I know. I said 95%. It was not a generalized practice in ancient almost-everything-else.
It wasn't until a few certain religions [...] that being gay was an evil.
I don't care what religions say. There's no "evil" per se, but it's unnatural and beyond my fuckup threshold. It is evil (not in a religious way) though when it's about destroying MY traditions (marriage and family; fags should find their own), and adopting and misleading children.
And animals are gay for pleasure. Look at monkeys, the closest to man.
Not all, and not always.
No matter what you say, we seek pleasure, breeding is not always what we want.
No matter what you say, I don't find pleasurable to fuck a guy's hairy ass.
And when it comes to pleasure, your cock doesn't differentiate, your higher conciousness does.
You're wrong. Pleasure is far more mental than physical. Despite my jokes on upper vs. lower brain, pleasure is a matter of what the brain likes, and what the brain likes is a matter of instinct combined with taste. I'm sure you'd enjoy fucking a hot, young girl far better than an old, fat woman, even if their pussies were the same.
And your higher conciousness is subject to influences such as society, religion, and what you find aesthetically appealing.
You forget we have instinct. And it's because of this instinct that sex is pleasurable. If it weren't for our natural instinct, rubbing cock would be like rubbing ring finger.
If you haven't noticed, nearly everytime that this comes up, it's you throwing your closeminded mindset at me, as a jest, yet mocking my midset still.
That was "4chan /b/tard pic". This is "friendly discussion".
IRT Xellos(2): Do you think a girl's a lesbian when she says how she finds another girl pretty?
Nope, and for the record, I'll say I find a few guys decent (as opposed to other guys which are just nasty) and that doesn't make me gay. However, if I go and say "Leonardo DiCaprio looks better than most other actors", you are in your right to exploit posting a hundred image macros calling me fag XP , regardless of if I'm actually gay, or if I wouldn't fuck a guy even if it were the last hole left in Earth.
general male macho homophobia-ness
I don't mind homophobia because gays are normalophobic anyways (although I'd bet my head you wouldn't admit this). But if you think it's homophobic to say gays can't marry because it's OUR civil union not theirs, tell me something. Would you call half of the world white-phobic if a bunch of whites demanded other races to pay them money and everyone and their mother told these whites to fuck off?
can appreciate pretty guys for being pretty. No actual attraction or anything, just a simple appreciation of it, the same as if you find a beautiful sculpture to be beautiful, without wnating to hump a hole in it.
I know.
You defend gays so fiercely though, it's like a bald man trying to sell baldness prevention products.
Actually, society tells you where your cock goes. Before that, you just do what feels good. And if that hole is pussy, ass, rat or melon, if it felt good, you'll do it again.